Noam Chomsky at UN (Oct 14th, 2014) "Solutions To The Israel-Palestine Conflict" http://www.democracynow.org/2014/11/27/in_un_speech_noam_chomsky_blasts
In this holiday special, we broadcast the words of world-renowned political dissident Noam Chomsky, who recently spoke in the hall of the U.N. General Assembly at an event sponsored by the United Nations Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. âThe pattern that was set in January 1976 continues to the present,â said Chomsky, Institute Professor Emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. âIsrael rejects a settlement of these terms and for many years has been devoting extensive resources to ensuring it will not be implemented with the unremitting and decisive support of the United States â military, economic, diplomatic and ideological.â
Many of the worldâs problems are so intractable that itâs hard to think of ways even to take steps towards mitigating them. The Israel-Palestine conflict is not one of these. On the contrary, the general outlines of a diplomatic solution have been clear for at least 40 years. Not the end of the roadânothing ever isâbut a significant step forward. And the obstacles to a resolution are also quite clear. The basic outlines were presented here in a resolution brought to the U.N. Security Council in January 1976. It called for a two-state settlement on the internationally recognized borderâand now Iâm quotingâ"with guarantees for the rights of both states to exist in peace and security within secure and recognized borders." The resolution was brought by the three major Arab states: Egypt, Jordan, Syriaâsometimes called the "confrontation states." Israel refused to attend the session. The resolution was vetoed by the United States. A U.S. veto typically is a double veto: The veto, the resolution is not implemented, and the event is vetoed from history, so you have to look hard to find the record, but it is there. That has set the pattern that has continued since. The most recent U.S. veto was in February 2011âthatâs President Obamaâwhen his administration vetoed a resolution calling for implementation of official U.S. policy opposition to expansion of settlements. And itâs worth bearing in mind that expansion of settlements is not really the issue; itâs the settlements, unquestionably illegal, along with the infrastructure projects supporting them.
![<?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/rp-navimg.gif)
![Support the <?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/support.png)
