Script/Transcript for program: Non-violent Activism in the Occupied Territories, Part 2
Last week, after the show with Neta
Golan and George Rishmawi, I got an
email that made me realize a lot of
folks have a concept that I call the
Time Magazine version of non-violent
action. According to this view, non-
violence begins with a good slogan
painted on a big sign. Then you pack up
a picnic lunch, gather up the kids, and
head for the designated location. Rest
assured there will be lots of
picturesque folks in colorful costumes,
music, speeches--a nice outing for the
family. This patronizing and superficial
view is meant to convince us that
nothing is ever really accomplished by
non-violent action anyway. According to
this view, Congress and the Supreme
Court, and the Southern Sheriff's
Association are going to give American
blacks their rights anyway; the British
were already planning to get out of
India. King and Gandhi weren't really
necessary. All you really have to do is
write a letter to your elected
representative, and he or -- no he will
set things right. The further
implication of this obvious lie is that
if anything really is wrong, justice
will require an army, some proper
helicopter gunships, a batallion of
tanks, and some fighter bombers.
Listening to Neta and George makes it
clear why the Time Magazine vision of
non-violence is false. In the first
place, Neta and George came to Canada
straight from the Palestinian occupied
territories. This is where the violent
approach and the non-violent approach
to the resolution of issues is being
worked out today--in our times. It's not
really a foreground issue at the moment
in the United States although that could
change soon. It's not an issue in
Britain or anywhere else in Europe. It's
certainly not an issue in Colombia or
the Congo or Myanmar. But it is a major
issue in Israel and the occupied
territories. That, dear listener, is
why we have spent 16 weeks exploring
peace and peacemaking in the Middle
East. Really, it's not a matter of
picking on Israel. Israel and the
territories. That's where it's
happening. You know--we can work it out,
but to kill or not to kill, that's the
central issue of this part of the 21st
Century. Listening to George and Neta
you will come to realize that non-
violence is not for sissies. Those who
choose the path of non-violence can
expect to be beaten, shot, arrested,
imprisoned, and deported. Whether or not
they may also be tortured, killed, or
have their families subjected to the
same atrocities depends, as we will
hear, largely on their race and their
religion. Race and religion aren't
supposed to matter, of course. But don't
take my word for it. See for yourself.
It's not a simple matter. As I write
this, across the green line in Israel
itself, 509 veterans and officers in the
Israeli army have refused to serve in
what they call the War of the
Settlements. More than a hundred of them
have been to prison for their views--
some, half a dozen times. Now, more than
200 shministim, or high school seniors,
have also refused. They are now
beginning to go to prison too. No one
has attacked their families or wrought
havoc on their homes--not yet. But
someone purporting to be a rabbi has
proposed publically--and with impunity--
that they should be executed as
traitors. Neta Golan had her arm broken
in a demonstration last summer. Caoimhe
Butterly, an ISM activist from Ireland,
was shot in the leg a couple of weeks
ago.
This is not a game for children. It's not a
game of slogans and pretty speeches. In
fact, it's not a game at all. Non-
violent action occurs, by definition, in
the context of violence. Its presence
allows us to measure the extent to which
justice, compassion, and the civil
society values of the combattants have
been corrupted or possibly even lost. As
outsiders, it matters to us, because as
John Donne said, "No man is an island."
Just as much to the point is the
observation by Allen Ginsberg, "If you
are not safe, I am not safe."
We have to hope for the best for both
people because the solutions that
Israelis and Palestinians find for their
conflict today will be the solutions
that we carry forward tomorrow in our
conflict with Iraq. We have to do better
than F-16s and cluster bombs.