Please note that the Radio4All website will be moving over to new server hardware on August 2nd starting at 10 AM Pacific/1PM Eastern. The work should last two to three hours. During that time, the server will be offline.
Welcome to the new Radio4all website! If you cannot log in, you may need to reset your password. Email here if you need additional support.
Your support is essential if the service is to continue, there are bandwidth bills to pay every month and failing disk drives to replace. Volunteers do the work, but disk drives and bandwidth are not free. We encourage you to contribute financially, even a dollar helps. Click here to donate.Welcome to the new Radio4all website! If you cannot log in, you may need to reset your password. Email here if you need additional support.
A considerable number of historians, political scientists and psychologists have begun to rely on psychology to explain political phenomena. They treat individuals as driven by covert, personal emotions, distorting our understanding of political life. Using the examples of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin and US President Herbert Hoover Parenti proves what is wrong with that analysis.
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin's opposition to the absolute monarch of Russia, the Tsar, psychohistorians say, came out of Lenin's unresolved issues with parental authority. When Herbert Hoover, after administering food aid for Belgium and Central Europe denied it to the hungry at home during the depression, psychohistorians characterized him as an active-negative president due to his very bad childhood. Parenti writes that in spite of his bad childhood Hoover had become a multi-millionaire and stood firmly with his fellow millionaires. He opposed jobless benefits and public assistance as creeping socialism while giving tax breaks to corporation. Parenti present a very different and intriguing explanation for the actions of Lenin and Hoover.